English
Blog
|
Wireless Power SolutionMaking Wireless Truly Wireless:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Wireless power is a lifestyle technology. Like Bluetooth and Wi-Fi, it radically changed the way people are able to live their lives, offering new levels of mobility, convenience and safety. |
Wireless power is a lifestyle technology. Like Bluetooth® and Wi-Fi™, it radically changes the way people are able to live their lives, offering new levels of mobility, convenience and safety. It has the ability to add value and create greater flexibility in the development and use of products across a wide range of power needs and industries. As such, it is imperative that a standard application of the technology be introduced to create the greatest opportunity for mass adoption and integration into consumers’ lifestyles. Questions on the possibility of a universal standard that will allow consumers a convenient source to power their devices without the inconvenience of adapters and power cords, no matter what the brand, are at the front of the wireless power conversations happening around the world, and without a universal standard, this will continue to be a challenge.
In addition to the challenges connected with individual organizations developing proprietary solutions, the number of market segments represented across the various power levels is another significant factor that must be considered. It is clear that technology is needed to bridge a broader range than each individual manufacturer would normally expect. The concept that a 60 watt power supply could power anything under that wattage and supply the proper device requirements was previously seen as costly. With the advent of advanced, low-cost power supply technology, this possibility is becoming reality. The adoption of this philosophy needs to align with consumers’ expectations. If pursuit of a universal standard is not made the highest priority, it could certainly limit the widespread adoption of wireless power technology.
In addition to addressing questions on the feasibility of a universal solution, the cooperative development of a standard also addresses other key issues that could threaten widespread adoption of wireless power technology.
The most prominent of these is the “Chicken or the Egg” issue, which poses the challenge to manufacturers on when to invest in wireless power technology. Device manufacturers want infrastructure in place before they commit to mass production of their products, and infrastructure manufacturers want devices to use with their products before they commit to mass production. Both are valid concerns. By working independently on proprietary solutions, this question creates a potential stalemate that could delay implementation of the technology for years. Through cooperative efforts both device and infrastructure manufacturers will reach solutions that achieve their mutual needs. Additionally, by coordinating development and production activities, manufacturers will be better positioned to respond to the actual consumer demand for an integrated, interoperable solution. Taking these thoughts into consideration, in the end, it seems obvious that devices need to be manufactured to enable infrastructure. However, consumer pull based on acceptance will ultimately determine the magnitude of industry adoption and timing of entry into the market space.
In addition to the “Chicken or the Egg” challenge, there are other equally important considerations that can be addressed by the cooperative efforts of a unified wireless power industry in pursuit of a global standard. Supply chain development and production costs are significant factors that can have a potentially negative effect on integration of the technology. Only when key contributors bring their collective capabilities and solutions to bear will wireless power be able to realize its immediate potential. By working with chip set manufacturers and developing design solutions collectively, issues like cost of implementation, safety, efficiency and environmental effects can all be mitigated and create an environment in which wireless power can flourish.
Like the model established by the Wi-Fi Alliance, Fulton Innovation (Fulton) has been working closely with a wide range of partners, including the Wireless Power Consortium, market leaders in every major electronics segment and other wireless power companies, to create and drive a global standard for wireless power. Initially, the standard will be established for low-power applications (5 watts and less). However, Fulton also has medium and high power solutions, creating new opportunities for companies to develop advanced applications, opening up the possibility of developing interoperable wireless power solutions across a broad spectrum of power needs and brands.
| Devices | 10% of annual income | Charge Power Watts | Standby Power Watts | Charge Hours/Wk | Standby Hours/Wk | Charge Power KW-Hr/Year | Standy Power KW-Hr/Year | Potential Savings in KW Hr @ 10% |
| Phones | 120,000,000 | 4 | 0.5 | 7 | 161 | 1.456 | 4.186 | 502,320,000 |
| Laptops | 15,000,000 | 45 | 0.5 | 14 | 154 | 32.76 | 4.004 | 60,060,000 |
| Headsets | 26,000,000 | 1 | 0.5 | 5 | 163 | 0.26 | 4.238 | 110,188,000 |
| Cameras | 12,500,000 | 4 | 0.5 | 4 | 164 | 0.832 | 4.264 | 53.300.000 |
| Computer | 20,000,000 | 2 | 0.5 | 7 | 161 | 0.728 | 4.186 | 83,720,000 |
| Media Players | 21,100,000 | 3 | 0.5 | 9 | 159 | 1.404 | 4.134 | 87.227.400 |
| Camcorders | 2,000,000 | 8 | 0.5 | 10 | 158 | 4.16 | 4.108 | 8,216,000 |
|
Total Annual KW-Hr @ 10% |
905,031,400 | |||||||
|
Total Dollars at 0.08/KW-Hr |
$ 72,402,512 | |||||||
|
Note: Volume and usage data are provided as an example. The 10% is an estimated volume that could have 100% time plugged in. |
||||||||
Table 1: Example Impact of standby power in devices.
Fulton holds over 400 granted, published, or pending patents world wide on wireless power development and applications, holding key technology in many areas, including medium and high-power applications, as well as in lower power delivery.
On that point, device standby power is a critical concern in the manufacture of power adapters and energy conservation and promises to be a key attribute in the development of wireless power solutions (see Table 1). Fulton uses a method called ultra-low standby power combined with efficiency comparable to wired systems to minimize the power footprint of wireless power systems.
| ...device standby power is a critical concern in the manufacture of power adapters and energy conservation and promises to be a key attribute in the development of wireless power solutions. Fulton uses a method called ultra-low standby power combined with efficiency comparable to wired systems to minimize the power footprint of wireless power systems. |
By understanding the user habits of the charge cycles and powering of devices, Fulton has designed a system that looks at the total power used as well as the convenience of charging. This equates to looking at total power used. In some cases, the standby power is actually a larger power concern than the power consumption during use. Up to seven times the consumption can be used in standby versus normal operation. Research has shown that consumers do not want the inconvenience of disconnecting the power when power usage by the portable device has been completed. Ultra-low standby power automates this process. Systems working together to minimize power usage while providing a universal wireless power source are just part of what intelligent wireless power must accomplish. The chart below provides an example of how standby power can impact overall efficiency.
It should also be noted that the efficiency of wireless power is usually considered in the context of a basic wire configuration. In some cases this would be true, but typically, elements of the wall or source power supply, the connection and the device power supplies, chargers and power management will all play a factor in this comparison. This is why wireless power can be considered comparable to wired solutions. With ultra-low standby power, it can provide even more latitude for wireless power in this comparison.
| Product | PJ4 | Metric Tons of CO2 | #1000MW power plant |
| Cell Phone | 21 | 4,200,00 | 0.7 |
| DECT Phone | 5 | 1,000,000 | 0.2 |
| Digital Camera | 2 | 400,000 | 0.1 |
| Set Top Box | 5 | 1,000,000 | 0.2 |
| Personal Care | 1 | 200,000 | 0.0 |
| Std. Battery Charger | 3 | 600,000 | 0.1 |
| Power Tool Charger | 4 | 800,000 | 0.1 |
| Printer | 4 | 800,000 | 0.1 |
| Laptop | 2 | 400,000 | 0.1 |
| Other | 10 | 2,000,000 | 0.3 |
Table 2: Total Energy for Production, Distribution, End of life CO2 Generated by Coal
Additionally, according to a 1394 Trade Association Technical brief, “the wall warts, also called ‘energy vampires,’ provided with so many electronic devices are often linear power supplies, which are approximately 30-40 percent efficient. That means that they waste up to 70 percent of the power being used by the device they are connected to. Unfortunately, when the device is turned off, it continues to consume power.” The effect of this wasted energy can be felt not only in the inefficiency of the wall warts, but also in the environmental impact of disposing of them. In 2008 alone, 3.2 billion external power supplies were manufactured worldwide, with 737 million external power supplies shipped to the U.S. Moreover, 434 million external power supplies will be retired in the U.S. alone and only 12.6 percent of them will be recycled, leaving 379 million external power supplies going into landfills (see Table 2). These devices don’t just go away either. According to the EPA “these power supplies are made with toxic materials and don’t have a lot of salvageable components making them unattractive to recyclers.”
| ...434 million external power supplies will be retired in the U.S. alone and only 12.6 percent of them will be recycled, leaving 379 million external power supplies going into landfills... |
In addition to the development of key IP across low, medium and high-power applications, Fulton has developed relationships with market leaders in the areas of chip set development, innovative product process and materials development, supply chain and distribution channel management and, with the Wireless Power Consortium, collaboration on a wireless power standard.
Fulton’s commitment to creating the best possible solution for mass adoption by consumers worldwide is an open invitation to all electronics manufacturers, wireless power developers, institutions of higher learning, governing bodies and any other interested parties to join in the development and dialog needed to drive integration of wireless power across the myriad applications of power delivery across the planet.
Wireless power is an exciting new frontier, opening up new possibilities for manufacturers and consumers around the world. This new frontier will have a major impact on many significant market segments and product design; in addition, it will provide environmental savings, simplify human interface with infrastructure and create new ways to interact with design of both devices and complementary products. As this technology reaches its tipping point and realizes mass adoption with consumers, it is imperative that engineering and design teams, wireless power solution providers, manufacturers and governing bodies collaborate closely to insure that a universal, interoperable solution that meets and anticipates immediate and future consumer needs is always made the first priority. Only by doing so will universal power delivery reach its potential and make wireless truly wireless.
David Baarman is the Director of Advanced Technologies at Fulton Innovation and the lead inventor of eCoupled™ intelligent wireless power technology. Mr. Baarman is responsible for the technical supervision and development of eCoupled technology and other Fulton Innovation technologies.
Mr. Baarman joined Amway in 1997, where he first pioneered the use of intelligent inductive coupling in the eSpring™ Water Purifier. With over 20 years of leadership experience in the development of consumer and industrial products, Mr. Baarman took the technology behind eSpring and developed it to power everyday technologies, including consumer electronics, with a diverse range of power needs.
Mr. Baarman’s efforts have led to national and global recognition of eCoupled technology and the acquisition of former competitor, Splashpower, in May 2008. Mr. Baarman has more than 350 U.S. and foreign patents that are granted or pending.
Footnotes:
1 Alliance for Universal Power Supplies. “The Facts and Market Drivers.” PowerPoint presentation for Organizational Meeting. June 13, 2008.
2 Greenburg, Ken. “Awash in Incompatible Power Supplies, Consumers Say Enough is Enough, New Green Plug Survey Reports.” Edge Communications. May 27, 2008. info@edgecommunicationsinc.com.
3 Rose, William. “1394 Trade Association Technical Brief: How Green is My FireWire?” WJR Consulting, Inc.