<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speed or consensus?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wirelesspowerconsortium.com/blog/2009/09/03/speed-or-consensus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wirelesspowerconsortium.com/blog/2009/09/03/speed-or-consensus/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 07:03:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Menno Treffers</title>
		<link>http://www.wirelesspowerconsortium.com/blog/2009/09/03/speed-or-consensus/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Menno Treffers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 17:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wirelesspowerconsortium.com/blog/?p=42#comment-44</guid>
		<description>@Kelli Garner: You can subscribe to the newsletter here: http://www.wirelesspowerconsortium.com/newsletter/subscribe.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kelli Garner: You can subscribe to the newsletter here: <a href="http://www.wirelesspowerconsortium.com/newsletter/subscribe.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.wirelesspowerconsortium.com/newsletter/subscribe.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelli Garner</title>
		<link>http://www.wirelesspowerconsortium.com/blog/2009/09/03/speed-or-consensus/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelli Garner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 22:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wirelesspowerconsortium.com/blog/?p=42#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Great site, how do I subscribe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great site, how do I subscribe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Menno Treffers</title>
		<link>http://www.wirelesspowerconsortium.com/blog/2009/09/03/speed-or-consensus/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Menno Treffers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wirelesspowerconsortium.com/blog/?p=42#comment-19</guid>
		<description>@Oles&#039;. Existing products are not compatible with Qi. Simply because Qi is not released yet. The products on our website are examples of the use of magnetic induction. When Qi is ready, the manufacturers of these products will have to decide whether to support Qi, or not. It is up to them.

And for the up-to-date list of members, look here: http://www.wirelesspowerconsortium.com/about/our-members.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Oles&#8217;. Existing products are not compatible with Qi. Simply because Qi is not released yet. The products on our website are examples of the use of magnetic induction. When Qi is ready, the manufacturers of these products will have to decide whether to support Qi, or not. It is up to them.</p>
<p>And for the up-to-date list of members, look here: <a href="http://www.wirelesspowerconsortium.com/about/our-members.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.wirelesspowerconsortium.com/about/our-members.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oles'</title>
		<link>http://www.wirelesspowerconsortium.com/blog/2009/09/03/speed-or-consensus/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Oles'</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wirelesspowerconsortium.com/blog/?p=42#comment-18</guid>
		<description>It is good to know that in future most receivers will be compatible with Qi transmitters.
One can see that Palm Pre Touchstone is listed at the top of products existing today. Apparently Palm is a member of the consortium. My question is about its compatibility. Will be Palm Pre compatible with future chargers with “Qi” label? Is it true that existing now Palm Pre will be possible to charge in the public places like café, airport, etc.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is good to know that in future most receivers will be compatible with Qi transmitters.<br />
One can see that Palm Pre Touchstone is listed at the top of products existing today. Apparently Palm is a member of the consortium. My question is about its compatibility. Will be Palm Pre compatible with future chargers with “Qi” label? Is it true that existing now Palm Pre will be possible to charge in the public places like café, airport, etc.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
