Wireless Power Consortium

Setting the international standard for interoperable wireless charging
The sign of compatibility

Archive for August, 2009

Standby Power

Thursday, August 20th, 2009

Energy efficiency matters.

We know that consumers love products without a connector, but it is impossible to beat the efficiency of a connector and copper wire. (No, superconductive wires are not more efficient than copper wires. The cost of cooling is prohibitive.)

So what can we do to create efficient wireless battery chargers?

We found that standby power consumption is the key. Standby power dominates total energy consumption for battery chargers that remain connected to mains power. By lowering standby power the total energy consumption is significantly reduced.

How low can you go? At first I thought we would have to trade low standby power against response time. You would expect that a responsive transmitter,  searching constantly for new power-demanding receivers,  will consume more power than a transmitter that goes to sleep and looks once a minute.

It turns out there is no need to trade response time. I have seen a Qi transmitter with a standby power of only 0.0001 Watt (100 µW) that detects new receivers instantaneously.

In the efficiency analysis that is published on the front page you can see what the effect is on total energy consumption.

Creative Tension

Saturday, August 15th, 2009

The draft specification is ready.  We can concentrate now on prototyping, verification, and on improving the readability of the specification.

The participants in a standardization effort usually have different requirements, different cultures and different solutions in mind. These differences slow down the technical work but the end result is more versatile and robust than a solution any one of the participants could have come up with alone.

I see that happening now. The tension between the different interests did not bog us down but sparked creativity. In the technology outline that is published on the front page you will see that it is possible to allow a variety of transmitter designs, all interoperable with a great variety of different receiver designs. That design freedom is the result of creative tension and the willingness to take other participant’s interests seriously.